Saturday, March 31, 2018

Fasten the seat belts


Many changes that call for a portfolio shake-up go beyond disruption caused by innovation

If there were any doubts of equity being a risk capital, three recent events have put them to rest. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India saw nothing wrong in predatory pricing. Coal mining has been opened to the private sector. The size of the Punjab National Bank money-siphoning fraud due to lax oversight ballooned by another Rs 1000 crore to Rs 12000-odd crore, souring the mood that was turning favorable after a series of reforms to clean up banks. The journey of the telecom sector from emerging as a new investment idea to a battle for survival is a tale of a recipe gone wrong in cooking. Due to 25% supply deficit, genuine end users had to import coal from countries that behaved like Shylocks, squeezing the buyers by imposing export tariffs even as fly-by-night operators cornered blocks at home out of turn. Negligence by the monetary authority in addressing complaints and by banks of warnings to plug the scope for misuse of systems and procedures has pushed the nationalized category to the edge. For a time, it looked the turmoil in all the three sectors was ebbing. Consolidation had cast aside the early gold digger and left only three telecom services providers with deep pockets. Bharti Airtel’s African business is showing signs of a bounce-back after being a drag on the consolidated performance since the costly foray. Idea’s merger with Vodafone India is progressing. The Aditya Birla group company is raising capital with end in sight to the pricing wars. Late-entrant Reliance Jio is charging, although very modestly, subscribers after providing free services, resulting in operating profit in the third quarter and lifting the parent’s share price. Coal India’s thrust on cost-efficiency translated into standalone profit in the latest three-month period from a loss a year ago. The capital infusion in banks that agreed to follow prudent norms and the central bank pulling the plug on the endless rehabilitation process and nudging defaulters to declare bankruptcy had seen a rerating of the industry. 

Recent regulatory-, industry- and company-specific developments, however, have created uncertainty instead of resolution. The decision of Trai to not interfere with pricing is being contested by Jio’s rivals. Those who were attracted by the cheap valuations might balk or reduce exposure, increasing the sector’s volatility. With its status as the sole supplier of coal under threat, the scarcity premium of Coal India will be under scrutiny. After recording the highest output last fiscal year, the economic slump has resulted in stockpiles and downward revision of the production target. As it is, the counter has shed more than 30% from its all-time high in July 2015. Despite being listed, there is lack of accountability in PSU banks. Their difficult-to-replicate reach was once envied and used as a justification for being invested. The digital revolution is reducing the compulsion of physical presence to be near the customer. The market value of a private bank with 150% lower gross advances is more than double of the largest government-owned lender. 


What these examples of fluctuation in the fortunes of companies and industries demonstrate is the fear of unknown that investors face. Disruptions can be gradual or sudden. There was hardly any warning about the transformation that Internet and wireless communication were set to usher. In contrast, the market is preparing for the imminent arrival of electric vehicles. India is promoting alternative energy sources so aggressively that the  solar industry is in distress as prices have crashed. China’s unexpected crack-down on polluting industries, a source of blue-collared employment, has given a new lease of life to manufacturers of steel and inputs in emerging countries. The surprising finding of the 1991 liberalization is that owning automobiles and white goods has become a necessity rather than a luxury. The dominant position achieved through the first-mover advantage can be challenged by smart upstarts that enhance user experience (private airlines), provide a price edge (online retailers) or cater to niche markets (new private banks). Often it is greed (rush into IT, telecom services and real estate) and technology innovation (online aggregators) that result in a shake-up. Sometimes the issues are complex. The accounting fraud by Satyam Computer Services did not affect its rivals but the PNB scandal triggered de-rating of its peers. The adverse impact of the ban on issue of letters of credit and undertaking for imports will be widespread and not restricted to the gem and jewelry sector. Will streaming content kill the movie-going habit that the advent of TV was forecast to do and the introduction of cellular phone has done to the traditional camera is a question that still cannot be answered with any firmness.     

Mohan Sule          

     


Monday, March 12, 2018

Time's up



Both equity and debt instruments carry investment risk and deserve a uniform tax treatment

The comeback of long-term capital gains tax on equities indicates a reversal of traditional policy formulation. Vehicles with uncertain outlook got preferential rates compared with those with predictable returns. Two arguments were offered in support of removing LTCG tax on stocks in 2005.  The most important justification was to encourage investors to take a longer view. The proposition was that it takes patience, ranging from three years to 10 years, for the investment to show a decent appreciation. The underlying message was only those who have surplus funds to spare should dabble in stocks. Yet the nil tax acknowledged that as the span of staying invested increases, so do the external and company-specific risks. Second, the unequal tax treatment punished trades based on arbitrage opportunities. Such strategies are capable of producing bumper gains in a short period and, hence, a higher tax rate. The nimble-footed participants, moreover, contribute to volatility, scaring the cautious investor as well companies who might want to pricing shares for private placement and follow-on offers, usually a function of historical averages. The higher rate of tax on fixed-income instruments, thus, is a response to the perception of predictable returns. In comparison with share capital, chances of a sharp appreciation or depreciation on debt are rare. The stock market reacts to news, minute by minute. Influencers of money market such as the credit policy and macro economic data dissemination are spaced out. 

Profit on debt is equated with income. Short-term gains are taxed accordingly. Ironically, most credit-worthy issues have coupons barely above inflation. Conceding that the interest rate scenario could undergo a change over a longer time, LTCG attract a lower tax rate with the benefit of indexation.  Even among debt instruments, the rate of tax is different. Interest on fixed deposits is deducted as per the personal tax slab. Indexation is not applicable irrespective of the holding period as banks and companies offer assured returns despite no guarantee about the trajectory of inflation going ahead. Bonds issued by companies and government absorb wide-ranging stimuli. Yields move in tandem with the outlook on interest rates. Prices depend on liquidity besides demand. As a nod to possible volatility, debt traded in the secondary market is categorized into short- and long-term holdings. The tax rate, however, is higher than that on short- and long-term gains from equities. Recent developments have ambushed the conventional theory. Over the last several years, liquidity was flowing into stocks and fixed-income paper from bond-buying by central banks in the developed world after a half-decade-long slump following the credit crunch triggered post September 2008. Indices have been hitting new highs at a pace that is not matching the earnings recovery. Investors in debt funds have been reaping rich gains as sluggish consumption kept interest rates low. The win-win scenario contributed to the perception of ease in making money.


Normally, bonds and equities find hard to coexist.  Investors opt for the safer debt over moody stocks when interest rates start climbing. Ironically, shares displaying exuberance in anticipation of the economy mending start shedding valuations when macro indicators confirm their confidence. Though the linkage has sustained over time, there is no surety that the equation will continue. Till recently, the money market was providing attractive returns in the belief that interest rates will only go down due to the fragile health of most countries even as the stock market was running ahead by betting on economic revival. Central banks by and large are reluctant to disturb the status quo to avoid panic in the financial markets. If they do so, they take care to sound contrite and give direct or indirect warnings on and off. As the developed and emerging nations stand poised to usher growth, the task of the monetary authorities is becoming complicated. Any hint that the economy is gathering pace creates turbulence instead of satisfaction. Dithering triggers even more chaos. Staying put is greeted with relief when the sentiment is bullish and frustration when it is bearish. Of late, the markets are taking away the power of the monetary authorities to shape the landscape. They react to fiscal deficit projections in India and unemployment data in the US to determine the direction of the economy without waiting for the central banks to act. As such it is time to revise the discriminatory tax treatment on equities and debt. Both are prone to sudden and violent movements and deserve a lighter tax touch irrespective of the duration of exposure.

-Mohan Sule